Question: Are there measurable differences in the response rates to Tweet activity by type of site?
Answer: Absolutely, yes!
The most attentive followers are true community members.
We mean true on and offline communities here- such as churches, clubs, membership based organizations. These site or profile followers are the most engaged as a group, and are 4x as likely to respond to a Tweet as a business or consumer site follower with a site click, or 4.4% * reach, with reach defined as (# of Followers * # of Tweets).
Business followers are paying more focused attention. Business site followers are 2x as likely to respond to a Tweet as a consumer site follower, or 2.2% times reach.
Consumer sites have the most diffused following. Using the median in our survey, the base formula for consumer followers to site traffic is 1.1% times reach.
What about Authority? Was there a variation in response rates when you adjusted for the "Followers to Following", or Authority, ratio?
We hypothesized that there would be a higher clickthrough rate when we adjusted for "authority"- seeing whether people who had significantly more people following them than they were following- and were surprised to see that wasn't the case. In other words, from this first cut at the data, one doesn't seem to get punished by following a lot of people. In some cases, reciprocal following even seemed to create goodwill and increase RTs and reposts.
Takeaways:
Adjust your expectations on results based on how central you are to a users' life. Community and Work trump Brands and Products in almost every case (*with the exception of promotional discounts and contests- that data is coming up in another post).
Don't hesitate to follow back if that's what's genuine for you or your brand.
Get your own data on social media performance by signing up for Socialogue today.
Newsletter Subscription |
Who Loves Us |
|
Copyright 2011 Socialogue Inc. All Rights Reserved
|